Best & Worst Advert of 2015

  

  

Figure One: 2015 Budweiser Super Bowl Commercial

Source: Budweiser. (2015).

Figure one shows a marketing campaign that was produced for Budweiser that was within the super bowl adverts. Budweiser is owned by Anheuser-Busch InBev and is a pale ale that generates millions of pounds revenue each year.

Within the United Kingdom the consumption of alcoholic beverages including ales is seen as a socially acceptable, often done when meeting up with friends either in the comfort of your own home or at an event. This array of social situations where alcohol is consumed displays how large the industry is within the UK.  

Figure Two: Average weekly consumption of alcoholic drinks by gender and age within the UK

Source: Institute of Alcohol Studies. (2013).

Figure two indicates that within the United Kingdom the main target market for beer drinkers is males between the ages of 25-44, another high target market is between the ages of 16-24. These age ranges statistically are Budweiser’s core target market, as the units undertaken by females is considerably lower, meaning that Budweiser would potentially maximize their revenues by aiming their marketing campaigns at men between these age groups.

The advertisement aforementioned features a small dog that climbs into a lorry and begins its adventure to get back home. Meanwhile the animal’s owner is beside himself worrying and putting up leaflets for his lost puppy. It then goes on to depict a wolf cornering the puppy, and a final climax of the horses breaking out of the barn to save the puppy from danger.   

This advert could be argued to show a theme of togetherness through a variety of underlying messages and techniques. Togetherness is symbolised in two different ways; the first being that the horses, fellow animals, came to the rescue of the puppy connoting a spirit of connection in the animal kingdom in which all animals have a protective attribute, similar to human nature. This feeling of belonging and having a friend to protect you is parallel to the social event of drinking that is typically done in a group, surrounded by friends whom would protect another if needed. Another subtle technique is the choice of the animal being a dog, often referred to as mans best friend, when the dog is returned to his worried owner there is a sense of relief in finding what he has been looking for. To some degree I believe that this dog is a metaphor for the product Budweiser, therefore attaching this sense of relief and togetherness with the beverage.

This is my chosen advert for the worst advert of 2015 so far due to a number of reasons. As previously stated Budweiser’s’ core target market is men aged between 16 and 44, yet in this advert there is an emotional and empathetic view required to fully appreciate the theme of togetherness. I do believe this advert to be more so befitting of the female target market with the use of a small, Labrador puppy and sad storyline. Also misrepresentation can be seen in this advert as the ale does in fact not feature anywhere in the advert. If a person was unfamiliar with this brand and what they produced it would be hard to infer from the storyline what the product was. Budweiser does not feature their product once within this advertising campaign, which is another reason why I believe it to not be a successful advertising campaign.  

Figure Three: This Girl Can Advertisement

Source: This Girl Can. (2015).

The second advert shown in figure three was created by sport England, it is extremely uplifting and very powerful. It was created to enhance the number of women taking part in regular exercise within the United Kingdom.

Figure Four: Participation In Moderate Intensity Sport

(Source: Zhang, D. (2014)

Figure four indicates that within the United Kingdom participation in sport has increased over the years, however according to Parker, O. (2015). 2 million fewer women are regularly participating in sport or exercise than men, despite 75 per cent of women aged 14 to 40 saying they’d like to do more. Therefore this advert is used to promote physical activity in women in the UK, and provide inspiration and motivation.

The second advertisement features an array of women from diverse backgrounds, showing a variety of ages, different body types and limitation being overcome by women through sport, such as disabilities. All of the individuals are taking part in some form of sporting activity.

Admap. (2003). Notes that music's main contribution to an ad is to increase interest and enjoyment. This reference indicates how important the choice of music within an advertisement can be, and within this advertisement I believe that the song choice is a vital part in its aims. The song chosen is upbeat and loud, suiting the topic perfectly. Another reason for this advert being the best within 2015 is because it is a socially effective advertisement, which can be used as a tool to motivate women of all sizes, ages and backgrounds to participate in sport. For an advertisement to feature a spectrum of different females or males is extremely rare, and undoubtedly powerful within this advert, as it promotes all women coming together to push themselves and most of all enjoy themselves. A message of anyone reaching a goal if they put their mind to it is present also. The utilisation of bold and empowering words during the clip is also poignant when discussing the strengths of this advertisement, the hard hitting lines are chosen to boost women’s confidence in taking part within sport. The truest positive regarding this advert is that it confidently opposes the idyllic image of women worshipped within the media. It focuses on real women with real aspirations whom participate in sport and feel good about it. This promotes the real meaning behind the advert that is to increase the numbers of participation in sport within females.

References

Admap. (2003). Best Practice: Music in advertising. Admap, 438 (1), 12-13.

Porteous, S.D. (2001). Counterfeiting MENACE. World trade. 14 (11), 28.

Budweiser. (2015). 2015 Budweiser Super Bowl Commercial “Lost Dog”. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAsjRRMMg_Q. Last accessed 1st May 2015.

Institute of Alcohol Studies. (2013). Alcohol consumption Factsheet. Available: http://www.ias.org.uk/uploads/pdf/Consumption%20docs/Alcohol%20consumption%20factsheet%20August%202013.pdf. Last accessed 1st May 2015.

Parker, O. (2015). This Girl Can advert: Scared of working out?. Available: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11334935/This-Girl-Can-advert-Scared-of-working-out-Watch-this.html. Last accessed 1st May 2015.

This Girl Can. (2015). This Girl Can. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aN7lt0CYwHg. Last accessed 1st May 2015.

Zhang, D. (2014). Sports and Energy Drinks. Available: http://academic.mintel.com/display/710555/. Last accessed 29th Oct 2014.

Social Psychology

Figure 1: Thank You Mom Advert

Source: Silverchair. (2012).

Figure one’s advert features a multinational corporation named P&G, whom are an umbrella band. Therefore any advertisement they choose is very important as bad publicity could cause a knock on effect for every product on their market line.  Within this advert it is evident that the ‘halo effect’ technique has been utilized. The Economist. (2009). Indicates that if people are good at doing A then they will be good at doing B, C and D (or the reverse—If people are bad at doing A they will be bad at doing B, C and D).

The advert focuses strongly on the halo effect, due to the fact that it highlights the general role of mothers within society as looking after and taking care of their children. This links in the mother using P&G products which are repeatedly shown in the background for reinforcement purposes of the products which this brand produces, by using P&G products it could be seen as indicating that the mother and the brand share the same credentials as loving and caring, also with the children all being successful within their sporting events at the end of the advert this could also be seen to link in with the credentials as they are all appear and seem to be successful products.

However, Nisbett, R, Wilson, T. (1977). Notes that if we like a person, we often assume that those attributes of the person about which we know little are also favorable. Also, The Economist. (2009). Reports that the halo effect was highly influenced by first impressions. If we see a person first in a good light, it is difficult subsequently to darken that light. Both references indicate that if for instance someone was to enjoy using P&G products then this type of advertising would be beneficial as it would persuade the individual to carry on purchasing their products, however a conflicting argument could be that if a person had issues with the brand P&G or did not like their products this type of advertising strategy would be unsuccessful as it would not entice them into purchasing their range of products.

Figure 2: Holidays At Home Advert (Solidarity)

Source: Visit England. (2012).

The advert for figure two features a number of successful British actors and actresses who all share common interests that is sharing a love for travelling within the UK. Baldwin, M. (1910). Notes that Solidarity is an affair of the mutual relations of a group of individuals to one another. The solidarity theory therefore links in with the love of the United Kingdom which the actors appear to have as they are all individuals which all share a mutual love for their country. All of the actors have the same interest, however there are still depictions of various activities that may be undertaken within the United Kingdom giving themselves a sense of individualism.

Figure 3: How Influential Are Celebrities

Source: Marketing Charts. (2014).

Alternatively a negative of using celebrities within a solidarity advertisement is that the chart above indicates that using a celebrity to endorse a product or service doesn’t enhance the chance of success. Therefore regarding this advert’s utilization of celebrity endorsement it may in fact not entice people into going on holiday within the United Kingdom, meaning the advert could be unsuccessful.

References

Baldwin, M. (1910). The Basis of Social Solidarity. American Journal of Sociology. 15 (6), 817.

Silverchair. (2012). Olympics P&G - Thank You Mom Commercial. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V-20Qe4M8Y. Last accessed 27th April 2015.

The Economist. (2009). The halo effect. Available: http://www.economist.com/node/14299211. Last accessed 27th April 2015.

Marketing Charts. (2014). How Influential Are Celebrities?. Available: http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/are-celebrities-that-influential-38018/. Last accessed 27th April 2015.

Nisbett, R, Wilson, T. (1977). The Halo Effect: Evidence for Unconscious Alteration of Judgments. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology. 34 (4), 250.

Visit England. (2012). Holidays at home are great TV advert | Great 2012 Offers. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viCZ4XjTliY. Last accessed 27th April 2015.

Self and Social Efficacy

Self-efficacy is a theory that was introduced by a psychologist called Albert Bandura. Bandura, A. (1977). The belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to manage prospective situations. This reference therefore indicates that self-efficacy is the belief of the individual within himself or herself to succeed on tasks or within situations.

There are four factors which affect self-efficacy according to Albert Bandura. The first factor is experiences, for example self-efficacy would be increased if the task was performed successfully previously, however if the past experience was negative this would weaken self efficacy. The second factor is social modeling, which simply means that if you were to witness another individual completing a task your social efficacy would increase, as you would feel that by viewing another person’s capabilities to complete a task successfully you also possess the required skills to complete the task.

The third factor according to Bandura’s model is social persuasion, this factor touches on that positive reinforcement from another individual can help overcome negative feelings helping with increasing efficacy. The fourth and final factor is psychological response; this focuses on the person’s emotions towards situations, for instance if a person becomes anxious before completing group work activities, this will decrease their self efficacy levels in completing group work tasks. 

Social efficacy differs from self efficacy as it focuses on creating social relationships with others in order to have a desired a positive outcome in difficult situations, and it is dependent on bringing satisfaction to other peoples lives.

Weedmark, D. Helping potential customers develop a sense of self-efficacy is an important motivator behind their decision whether or not to purchase a product or service. This reference touches on why it is crucial in order to run a successful marketing campaign that self and social efficacy is touched on.

Figure 1: Nike Run Advert

Source: Sweney, M. (2012).

For instance figure one touches on self-efficacy as it includes the theory of Bandura within this marketing campaign advertisement. Bandura’s first stage of self-efficacy would be to draw on past experiences, and as this advert will be aimed at keen runners or people who enjoy physical activity or wish to lose weight this would be the perfect target market. The campaign features an Olympic gold medal winner Mo Farah to encourage people even more to purchase this product with the use of celebrity endorsement. The second stage of Bandura’s model which was previously mentioned is social modeling that is depicted within this advertisement as it depicts Mo Farah having the required capabilities to complete this task of running to a high ability.

The third factor of social persuasion could be interpreted by the slogan written in the bottom left of the advertisement, this is a motivational device to enhance positivity and furthermore increase self-efficacy. Finally the fourth factor is involved within this as Nikes customer base may have a large interest in physical activity, specifically running, so may have positive feelings towards the advertisement through association in the three previous factors. Therefore self-efficacy should be higher in Nike’s target market inducing higher sales and revenue from this advert for their running products.

It could be interpreted that through the use of advertisement, which is mentioned in figure, one could be positively increasing a persons self and social efficacy it could also be argued that the use of marketing mentioned could be frowned upon. This could be questioned as to if its ethically right using peoples self-esteem and confidence of themselves as to what products they may buy in an attempt to increase this or be shone away from purchasing that product or service. Therefore marketing could be a primary step to manipulate the general public in to purchasing specific goods and services.

Figure 2: Calvin Klein Advertisement

Source : Zhang, M. (2015).

Figure 3: Victorias Secret Model Advertisement

Source: Culp-Ressler, T. (2014).

The above advertisements could be seen as negative because it depicts an unreachable goal in which the average person may not be able to reach, showing a weakness in Bandura’s theory. By over editing and dramatizing certain features of both male and female models these brands portray the “perfect body” ostracizing the general public to an extent, which may affect a minority of their target market.

An opposing view on this is that both brands may increase larger revenue due to more products being purchased due to the fact that these advertisements show a social stereotype of the idealistic, utopian-like man and woman. Viewing these ‘Victoria Secret Angels’ wearing the garments of lingerie through the theory of social efficacy a woman may depend on the idea of looking like the models if she was to purchase said items.  Furthermore, by utilizing society’s idea of the idyllic woman and man these brands can manipulate consumers into a false state of if they were to wear the products it would make them closer to the unachievable ‘perfect models.’

Groesz LM, Levine MP, Murnen SK (2001). Boys learn to view their bodies as a tool to master the environment, whereas girls learn that their bodies should be used to attract others. This reference supports my earlier statement, Victoria secret employs unrealistic expectations through models to attract other women to aspire to be like them, however it can hinder women from purchasing products from this company as it may damage confidence levels, therefore affecting social efficacy and the chance that the consumer may have a relationship with this brand.

References:

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Culp-Ressler, T. (2014). Victoria’s Secret Edits ‘Perfect Body’ Ad After Critics Complained It Was Damaging To Women. Available: http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/11/06/3589806/victorias-secret-edits-ads/. Last accessed 8th April 2015.

Groesz LM, Levine MP, Murnen SK (2001). The Effect of Experimental Presentation of Thin Media Images on Body Satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic Review. Ohio: ohn Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Eat Disord. p1-16.

Sweney, M. (2012). Nike launches ad celebrating Mo Farah Olympic gold medal wins. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/aug/13/nike-ad-mo-farah-olympics. Last accessed 8th April 2015.

Weedmark, D. The Importance of Self-Efficacy in Marketing. Available: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/importance-selfefficacy-marketing-38729.html. Last accessed 8th April 2015.

Zhang, M. (2015). Shoot Reveals Photoshop Enhancements. Available: http://petapixel.com/2015/01/09/unretouched-photo-justin-biebers-calvin-klein-shoot-reveals-photoshop-enhancements/. Last accessed 8th April 2015.